Matthew Stewart (1) (1963–)
Forfatter af The Courtier and the Heretic: Leibniz, Spinoza, and the Fate of God in the Modern World
For andre forfattere med navnet Matthew Stewart, se skeln forfatterne siden.
Om forfatteren
Matthew Stewart is the author of The Courtier and the Heretic: Leibniz, Spinoza, and the Fate of God in the Modern World and The Management Myth: Debunking the Modern Philosophy of Business.
Værker af Matthew Stewart
The Courtier and the Heretic: Leibniz, Spinoza, and the Fate of God in the Modern World (2006) 792 eksemplarer
Monturiol's Dream: The Extraordinary Story of the Submarine Inventor Who Wanted to Save the World (2003) 54 eksemplarer
The Truth About Everything: An Irreverent History of Philosophy : With Illustrations (1997) 50 eksemplarer
Satte nøgleord på
Almen Viden
- Fødselsdato
- 1963-01-02
- Køn
- male
- Nationalitet
- USA
- Fødested
- Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
- Bopæl
- New York, New York, USA
Santa Barbara, California, USA
Washington, D.C., USA
Virginia, USA
Barcelona, Spain
Boston, Massachusetts, USA - Uddannelse
- Princeton University (BA)
Oxford University (DPhil|Philosophy|1988) - Erhverv
- management consultant
philosopher
Medlemmer
Anmeldelser
Lister
Hæderspriser
Måske også interessante?
Associated Authors
Statistikker
- Værker
- 5
- Medlemmer
- 1,306
- Popularitet
- #19,653
- Vurdering
- 3.9
- Anmeldelser
- 32
- ISBN
- 45
- Sprog
- 3
As a summary of philosophy and a 'history of philosophy' re: origins of modern democratic thought, it is great. 4 or even 5 stars. As a history of the irreligious origins of America... less so.
The problem I keep coming up against is two fold. Stewart will go on at great length discussing the details of some philosophical point, who held that point, and -then, for the length- trace the origins and evolution of that idea from Hobbes, Spinoza, Locke, Shaftesbury, Pope, and then Young and/or Allen... and then (1) buried in discussing popular support and passion because of (or aligned with) these philosophical points are snippets, backgrounds, nods to the fact that these ideas, shorn of some of their religious implications, were popular while religious belief was simultaneously popular and, often, vehement, and (2) that the revolutionary elites themselves were divided similarly.
I myself am an atheist, and a firm supporter of the 'heretical' tradition... but as an act of history, I'm not sure that Stewart sells the idea that the US government was founded on heretical... beliefs. This is a somewhat subtle point, having more to do with psychology, perhaps, than philosophy. But it is also a historical point. We're told that some point was championed by a set of 'heretical' thinkers, but that the language then had to be toned down for popular passage, and that some of the thinkers themselves bailed out over the 'atheistic' ideas/language. So... the hereticial/atheistic/Deistic ideas were there, no doubt, but there was popular and elite resistance to them "as such."
I think this book is a welcome addition, and something of an antidote to the 'Christian nation' narrative. But it aims at showing that we're instead a 'heretical nation,' and much as I wish that, it fails (and somewhat badly, I think.) Or, if we are a 'heretical nation,' we were founded on an amalgam of heresy, conservatism, and common belief. Which in my mind means we're neither a 'heretical' nation nor a 'Christian' nation.
As a history of philosophy, on the other hand, it is a book I will likely reread for its detail and analysis, even if it is very dense in parts.… (mere)