HjemGrupperSnakMereZeitgeist
Søg På Websted
På dette site bruger vi cookies til at levere vores ydelser, forbedre performance, til analyseformål, og (hvis brugeren ikke er logget ind) til reklamer. Ved at bruge LibraryThing anerkender du at have læst og forstået vores vilkår og betingelser inklusive vores politik for håndtering af brugeroplysninger. Din brug af dette site og dets ydelser er underlagt disse vilkår og betingelser.

Resultater fra Google Bøger

Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books

Indlæser...

Reckoning with Risk: Learning to Live with Uncertainty (2002)

af Gerd Gigerenzer

MedlemmerAnmeldelserPopularitetGennemsnitlig vurderingSamtaler
1485184,641 (3.74)Ingen
In the beginning of the 20th century, the father of modern science fiction, H.G. Wells, predicted that statistical thinking would be as necessary for citizenship in a technological world as the ability to read and write. Yet, a century on, most of us, from TV weather forecasters to the American President, seem to have no idea of how to reason about uncertainties.… (mere)
Indlæser...

Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog.

Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog.

Engelsk (4)  Italiensk (1)  Alle sprog (5)
Viser 5 af 5
Lots of good points, but a bit laborious. All how best to convey clearly information about risk. How doctors usually don’t understand the first thing about probability and how to communicate risks, changes in risk and relative risks clearly, especially when Bayes rule is needed. Definitely for the specialist how isn’t a specialist in maths. ( )
  jvgravy | Sep 5, 2022 |
L'idea di base era ottima: riuscire a dimostrare anche a chi non ha studiato statistica che le probabilità assegnate ad alcuni eventi non sono affatto quelle che si pensa. Anche gli esempi sono scelti in maniera da interessare: vedere come al processo contro O.J. Simpson l'avvocato difensore è riuscito a girare le carte in tavola e convincere la giuria che la probabilità che il suo cliente fosse un assassino fosse molto più bassa della realtà; oppure calcolare come essere positivi a un test antiAIDS non significa poi molto se non si appartiene a un gruppo a rischio.Però Quando i numeri ingannano è stato almeno per me una delusione. Non so se è perché i concetti io almeno in teoria li conosco, oppure perché il libro è troppo ripetitivo e io mi annoio in fretta. Ma garantisco che lo stesso materiale io l'avrei condensato in duecento pagine. ( )
  .mau. | Nov 17, 2017 |
This book investigates how statistics may be misused by the medical and legal professions to mislead the public. It lists simple ways to cut through the statistical clap-trap and derive figures meaningful to the human brain. This would be an insightful read for educators and the public alike. ( )
  martensgirl | Jun 23, 2012 |
This book is highly recommended for anyone who has to use numbers to communicate information or who tries to interpret numeric information to make informed judgements.

The book has as its central theme the confusion caused, intentionally or otherwise when information is presented poorly. It presents a truly startling picture of the resulting innumeracy not just within the general public but also amongst trained professionals.

Though the lessons are generic, a significant portion of the book deals with examples drawn from the world of medicine. These are used to illustrate the very simple root causes by which information is presented in ways that obscure meaning and make reasoned judgement difficult if not impossible.

These medical examples are far from obscure and deal with issues that will be of concern to many of us, such as data on HIV AIDS, Breast Cancer Screening, Prostate Cancer and use of the contraceptive pill for example.

The thrust of the book is not that information does not exist to assist judgement of risks in these areas, but that the way it is presented and communicated serves to perpetuate innumeracy amongst patient and clinician alike. This innumeracy can have dramatic consequences with inappropriate treatments being selected and patients being caused undue worry, distress or physical harm. An example is cited of a surgeon who performed breast removal operations on 90 patients who showed no sign of disease, simply based on his interpretation of the risk they faced of contracting it in the future.

The examples are not limited solely to medicine and the legal profession comes in for its share of scrutiny including DNA fingerprinting and an insightful look at how innumeracy may have contributed to the outcome of the O.J. Simpson case.

The lessons for the broader business community are clear.
The book is divided in to three sections that don’t just provide examples of the problem of effectively communicating data but clear simple guidance on how it can be avoided.

By dealing with topic areas that many of us will recognise the book is able to clearly illuminate the problems of innumeracy and graphically illustrate the impact this can have with lessons for our personal and business lives. It may also provide particularly valuable insights for those who face the specific health problems it uses as examples and help create understanding of the real risks faced for example by a positive breast cancer screening result.

The book also has some absurd but real examples of innumeracy lunacy, for example the Mexican government which increased road volume by simply repainting a four lane highway with six lanes - a 50% increase. The high volume of accidents this caused led to the road being reduced back to 4 lanes - a 33% reduction and the later claim that road volume had actually been increased by 17%! It also has a section of fun examples of innumeracy to help drive the point home and a chapter on teaching clear thinking.

I highly recommend this book as an entertaining an illuminating read. It may help allay unnecessary fears for those facing personal medical problems and will certainly improve everyone’s ability to ask the right questions to get to the bottom of what data is really telling us. ( )
  Steve55 | Jan 18, 2009 |
Viser 5 af 5
ingen anmeldelser | tilføj en anmeldelse
Du bliver nødt til at logge ind for at redigere data i Almen Viden.
For mere hjælp se Almen Viden hjælpesiden.
Kanonisk titel
Information fra den italienske Almen Viden. Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
Originaltitel
Alternative titler
Oprindelig udgivelsesdato
Personer/Figurer
Vigtige steder
Vigtige begivenheder
Beslægtede film
Indskrift
Tilegnelse
Første ord
Citater
Sidste ord
Oplysning om flertydighed
Forlagets redaktører
Bagsidecitater
Originalsprog
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

Henvisninger til dette værk andre steder.

Wikipedia på engelsk

Ingen

In the beginning of the 20th century, the father of modern science fiction, H.G. Wells, predicted that statistical thinking would be as necessary for citizenship in a technological world as the ability to read and write. Yet, a century on, most of us, from TV weather forecasters to the American President, seem to have no idea of how to reason about uncertainties.

No library descriptions found.

Beskrivelse af bogen
Haiku-resume

Current Discussions

Ingen

Populære omslag

Quick Links

Vurdering

Gennemsnit: (3.74)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 6
3.5 4
4 4
4.5 3
5 3

Er det dig?

Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter.

 

Om | Kontakt | LibraryThing.com | Brugerbetingelser/Håndtering af brugeroplysninger | Hjælp/FAQs | Blog | Butik | APIs | TinyCat | Efterladte biblioteker | Tidlige Anmeldere | Almen Viden | 204,725,758 bøger! | Topbjælke: Altid synlig