The author does a very good job of showing how disadvantaging women is bad for everyone. However she never questions the idea that growing the economy is a basic good.

I read the German translation. ( )

Really interesting book that is full of information about how women are really prevented from reaching their full potential by the economy and the patriarchy. And how this harms the global economy. ( )

La respuesta a El capital de Karl Marx que no se olvida de la mitad de la población. Nominado al mejor Libro del Año para el Financial Times y uno de los mejores libros de 2020 para The Guardian.

Estamos en 2021. El 99% del comercio internacional y los contratos institucionales de compraventa los firman hombres. La esclavitud moderna es mayoritariamente femenina. El 80% de toda la superficie cultivable del mundo tiene nombre masculino. El pulso de la economía es profundamente desigual, pero nunca antes de hoy fue tan fácil resolver tantos problemas atacando solo uno.

En este ensayo incontestable, nominado por el Financial Times a Mejor Libro del Año, Scott desarrolla el concepto «economía Doble X», que alude tanto a las descomunales desigualdades que el sistema global provoca en las mujeres como al poder colectivo potencial de todas ellas si tuvieran la opción de afectar directamente a las decisiones económicas mundiales. A pesar de estar continuamente amenazada, subyugada y devaluada, esta economía XX contiene las semillas de un sistema cooperativo más exitoso y respetuoso que el orden bajo el que vivimos ahora.

La economía Doble X es una sólida denuncia del sistema financiero actual, cimentada en centenares de datos e investigaciones sobre el terreno, pero también una apasionada exhortación hacia un cambio que tendría repercusiones en cada aspecto de nuestra vida.

This was a fascinating and infuriating read about women's role in the economy and how we can improve it. It was a refreshing change from many feminist books because Scott uses a much wider net--she draws from countries all over the world, not just well off Western nations, for her examples. Her work in non-Western countries tends to be amongst the poorest, which makes the contrast sharp, but her theme is not that the West is better: it's that it's all variations on an ancient theme to remove women's economic power. She cuts right through common arguments about the pay gap and education--for example, she points out that removing factors like children and care obligations proves only that women achieve equal pay if they act like men, since those factors are so heavily skewed towards women.

Just as importantly she points out how much women's economics matter to the economy as a whole. Not only do women earn money, they spend it. In the US, 67% of consumer spending is determined by women. Research in developing countries has shown that giving women more control over family finances not only benefits them but their children.

I would have liked a little more attention paid to the economic value of women's caring labor, instead of just talking about universal daycare (important, but not the only point). Women's economic value is systematically undervalued because their domestic labor is not included and not thought to be an economic contribution. ( )