After reading Elizabeth Ironside's The Accomplice, I was so impressed that I bought her other four books. This book is also written in a format that I particularly enjoy when it is done well, with multiple narrators whose testimony must be pieced together, so that in the end the reader knows more than any of the characters. This story is so dark that I was at first tempted to read it later, and then utterly enthralled.

The main character here is Théophile de Cazalle, a career army officer. After the German occupied France, he deserted the so-called Free France of Marshal Petain and escapes to England to work with the French government in exile. He faked his death, to protect his family. Now he returns for a brief visit to his family's last property, the farm Bonnemort, to find some of the people he left behind dead, some sent to Germany as forced labor, some as resistance workers, and his wife, with her head shaved, the mark of a collaborator. When he returns again, his wife has fled to Paris with the granddaughter of a friend of her father's. He begins to meet with her, to consider the repair of their marriage, and to attempt to learn what has happened in the years that he was gone. Was his wife a collaborator, and a lover the the German major who requisitioned the house, and was found lying naked and dead in front of it? Or was she a Resistance heroine?

Theo finds contradictory witnesses, whose testimony is dictated by their personal feelings and political beliefs. He finally has a very long talk with a Russian exile, Nikola, living in the area, Nikola, who helps him piece all the testimony together.

I am torn as to whether the conversation with Nikola is a strength or weakness of the book. Nikola likes to talk at length and in great detail, and as a reader, I shared the frustration of Theo. listening to a long-winded man whose testimony he needs, and therefore cannot hurry.

The story is told at a very interesting point in the war - the liminal time when the Germans are gone from the immediate area, but the war is not over, the people who have endured do not yet know all of their losses, and have not recovered from their privations. A time when those who united in resistance now, although not in strategy, now fracture to undercut each other for control of the hopefully glimpsed future.

I smiled a bit at the reviewer who could not believe that Theo is so obsessed with finding out whether his wife was a collaborator and perhaps lover of a German officer. They must be much younger than I. Their marriage, so unsuitable to both their families, was one of passion, which would make infidelity much more personal and cutting. The question is not only sexual jealously, but a need to know what kind of a woman she truly is. Has she has been undercutting the cause that he has dedicated himself to, and also a concern about the future consequences for him, especially should he decide to go into politics, of her conduct.

His daughter, Sabine raises a very difficult question. She has indeed suffered, but does suffering justify bad conduct? We may have some compassion, but what, exactly, do we do with it. I had a friend who argued that no-one commits a murder unless they have been wronged, not necessarily by their victim, and therefore they are not guilty, and deserve our compassion, not punishment. Be that as it may, I distressed her by saying, they cannot be allowed to continue killing people, or inflicting lesser sufferings upon them. Do we have free will? Two people may suffer the same misfortunes, and one may come out of it feeling empathy for other people, and the other may resent anyone who is more fortunate in their eyes, or turn their anger and resentment outwards on other people. What makes the difference?

I also think that it raises the question of attention to our children. Sabine was definitely abused at the convent school she attended. The nuns, when they were not vicious, were negligent. Should we take the attitude that it doesn't matter what one child does to another, it's "a learning experience" for the victim? As with Sabine, we may find that we don't care for what they have learned. I would argue that contrary to what is often thought, just because a child is old enough to left alone with regard to their physical safety, they don't require supervision for their moral and social development, and they often aren't physically and sexually safe, either.

Another question is "power over," the sometimes mysterious ability of one person to dominate another. This subplot is used three time, which I think is one time too many. In the first case, in the convent boarding school, the girl who has made herself dominate has many accomplices to help her wield her power. This probably leads to the second incident, where the victim dominates another girl. The third time, which comes at the end of the main story, not the epilogue, is one too many for me. It doesn't particular fit what we know about the character, not does it serve any purpose that I can see, unless it is to make her look bad. I hated that. That's a half-star off.

The second problem with the ending is that an adolescent girl has been given a severe beating - she even has a broken arm. Her friend decides to avenge her, but the method makes no sense at all. She baits the trap by telling the beater that the girl wants to see him. But surely he knows that she was badly hurt. He doesn't wonder why she would want to see him, or how she is in any condition to make a trek up to a cave? Is he expecting a declaration of undying love or a sexual encounter? It doesn't occur to him that when he gets to the cave, he will find her father with his sidearm? She hasn't told her family what happened yet, she's in pretty bad shape, but the beater doesn't know that? That's the other half-star. It's not so bad that it ruins the story, but once I had a chance to think about, it seemed pretty idiotic. Sometimes, when something is otherwise excellent, I'm able to mentally edit out bad scenes.

Aside from those two caveats, I found the story fascinating and thought provoking, and I love Elizabeth Ironside's writing. ( )

Theo Cazalle returns to his home in the French countryside in 1944, after serving with the Free French a few years before. Very little is the same, however. The Germans had occupied the area and had lived in his family home while his wife and child and visiting child moved to a nearby building. His wife, Ariane, was beautiful and had attracted the attention of the German leading the occupation. When Theo returned some were saying she was a collaborator. Was she?

In this book the war times and the after-war times are intertwined so that we gradually figure out what went on during those years. As important as Adriane are her two charges, Sabine and Suzie. Sabine is her daughter while Suzie is the daughter of friends from another part of France, who are very ill.

Sabine and Suzie grow into their early teens together and are seen as close. However, Sabine controls their relationship, ordering Suzie around and managing all of their activities.

Meanwhile, the family caretaker, Henri, has joined the resistance. He is cautious and circumspect so that of course not everyone knows. His wife is not happy with the situation as it threatens their lives.

Adriane is drawn into the web of conspiracies among the Germans, the Free French, and the Resistance. Is she part of any of them? Does she have feelings for the German officer? Theo doggedly seeks out the answer.

An interesting perspective of the French after and during WWII. Always it is useful to learn a little more about this period, as experienced by those in other countries.

I was a bit put off by Sabine's personality as presented here. I did not want to buy it. I believe that people often attribute base motives to others without finding out what the real motives are, and it seemed odd to me that Sabine would spring from good parents and caretakers to become so cruel. Cruelty had been inflicted on her but not by everyone. I would have appreciated a more nuanced character.

Altogether a good story with much to think about. And a bit of a mystery to be sure. ( )

Set in post WWII France, this excellent novel deals with issues of collaboration and resistance, acceptance and forgiveness. Although classified as a mystery and focused around the issue of who murdered the German soldier found naked and dead in a farmyard, it is more about human nature and the moral imperatives of war and occupation. A good read and a thoughtful novel. ( )

Who killed the German SS officer who may, or may not have been lover's with the woman whose home he occupied? Was she a collaborator or a heroine of the resistance? What role did the different factions of the resistance play in the events? When Theo Gazalle returns home with the Gaulist forces at the end of the war he can either search for the answers or resign himself to his wife's withdrawal from their marriage. The novel moves between the events of the recent past and the investigation as he pieces together the answers. Excellent.

I just wrote a detailed review, but lost it by clicking on the other tab before I saved. Suffice it this time around to say I received the book free, read it to fill time and expose myself to genre and subjects I don't usually read and an author and publisher I didn't know. Under those conditions, it wasn't awful, but neither did it win me over to seeking out any similar books.

My main criticisms are that I figured out all but a minor conclusion long before they were revealed, but there were other things that didn't make sense. And I don't buy, even given Y chromosomes in France in the mid-20th century, Theo's obsession with learning whether his wife had indeed collaborated sexually with the Nazis occupying Theo's family home for most of a year. In particular, no matter how little relationship he had with his daughter (from an earlier marriage), I don't buy his returning to the country from Paris because she'd been beaten senseless, and immediately setting off to interview another source about his wife's behavior (which interview involved drinking all night and being uselessly hung over, so that he didn't even go to see his daughter, all the next day).

Come to think of it, most of the men in this book were pretty cardboard characters. I don't like that any more than when men are incapable of writing women. But I did appreciate the quiet strength of the women and learned a good bit about how such women got through the war, even when there were no great battles in their area. I will always think a little more fondly of pigs, even when I eat them, and now I have a name for them. There's quite a bit of violence in the book, and vividly recounted, but other than the convent-school bullying that warped Theo's daughter, not enough to keep me from reading in bed. ( )