HjemGrupperSnakMereZeitgeist
Søg På Websted
På dette site bruger vi cookies til at levere vores ydelser, forbedre performance, til analyseformål, og (hvis brugeren ikke er logget ind) til reklamer. Ved at bruge LibraryThing anerkender du at have læst og forstået vores vilkår og betingelser inklusive vores politik for håndtering af brugeroplysninger. Din brug af dette site og dets ydelser er underlagt disse vilkår og betingelser.

Resultater fra Google Bøger

Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books

Michelangelo af William Wallace
Indlæser...

Michelangelo (udgave 2011)

af William Wallace (Forfatter)

MedlemmerAnmeldelserPopularitetGennemsnitlig vurderingSamtaler
755353,257 (4.06)Ingen
In this vividly written biography, William E. Wallace offers a new view of the artist. Not only a supremely gifted sculptor, painter, architect and poet, Michelangelo was also an aristocrat who firmly believed in the ancient, noble origins of his family. The belief in his patrician status fueled his lifelong ambition to improve his family's financial situation and to raise the social standing of artists. Michelangelo's ambitions are evident in his writing, dress and comportment, as well as in his ability to befriend, influence and occasionally say 'no' to popes, kings and princes. Written from the words of Michelangelo and his contemporaries, this biography not only tells his own stories, but also brings to life the culture and society of Renaissance Florence and Rome. Not since Irving Stone's novel The Agony and the Ecstasy has there been such a compelling and human portrayal of this remarkable yet credible human individual.… (mere)
Ingen
Indlæser...

Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog.

Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog.

Viser 5 af 5
In this informative and fast paced biography of Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni. We learn about his life, his family, his relationships with other artists and patrons, his friends, some of the politics occuring in Rome and Florence during his lifetime, and something of his projects and poetry. Wallace has reserarched his subject extensively and makes use of (and quotes) many of Michelangelo's personal letters. However, Wallace doesn't not elaborate on any methods or techniques Michelangelo made use of during his many projects. I would also have liked more detail on how Michelangelo dealt with all his commissions, assistants and actualy physicaly work.

The book includes 10 colour photographs of Michelangelo's works, but it would have been more helpful if the author had included photos of all the works discussed in the book so the reader could see what he was talking about. The book also includes a list of all the popes during Michelangelo's lifetime, as well as a "cast of principle characters" which is useful since a great many people have the same first name.

This biography is accessible, informative and makes a good introduction to the subject.

OTHER BOOKS

-Brunelleschi's Dome: How a Renaissance Genius Reinvented Architecture by Ross King
-Michelangelo and the Pope's Ceiling by Ross King ( )
  ElentarriLT | Mar 24, 2020 |
Oscar Wilde once said, "I think a man should invent his own myth." One man for whom it could be said that he did this, at least indirectly through his contributions, is Michelangelo. He was born on March 6, 1475, in Caprese, Italy to a family of moderate means in the banking business. He became an apprentice to a painter before studying in the sculpture gardens of the powerful Medici family. What followed was a remarkable career as an artist in the Italian Renaissance, recognized in his own time for his artistic virtuosity. It was a career of "an aristocrat who made art" according to his biographer William Wallace. Wallace's biography is compact at less than four hundred pages but it provides a generous amount of detail and interesting theories about the nature and importance of Michelangelo's life. Wallace studied biographies of other artists in his preparation for this work including those written by Richard Ellman, David Cairns, and Maynard Solomon. I think this helped him shape a worthy life of Michelangelo.

That Michelangelo was an artist worthy of note is a notion that began in his own lifetime as his contemporaries were writing about his life when he was in his early fifties. He was the only living artist to be included in Giorgio Vasari's famous Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors and Architects in 1550. Although this was an honor, perceived inaccuracies in Vasari's text led Michelangelo to ask his pupil and amanuensis, Ascanio Condivi, to write his biography. This Life of Michelangelo appeared three years later and emphasized, among other things, Michelangelo's noble origins. Thus the potential myth-making began. Wallace relies on many original documents including the letters of Michelangelo, of which there were more than a thousand, his records, and his family correspondence. I was interested in the attention paid to his poetry as I have long been fond of his sonnets. Not unexpectedly, however, the documentation for his life is uneven with gaps that make some of his life, especially the earlier years, more difficult to portray.
I appreciated the biographer's attention to the culture of the Renaissance and Michelangelo's place in it. The cultural history of society was presented with a focus on his times in Rome and Florence during progressive artistic periods of his life. The story of the artist reminded me of the story of other artists as Michelangelo was like many others who had difficulty persuading their father that the career of an artist was better than a prestigious profession and an advantageous marriage. Yet, even while Michelangelo insisted on an artistic career he still sometimes harbored misgivings and had doubts; nonetheless forging ahead in a direction that he thought would "resuscitate" his family name. Even more important to him, and this was an aspect of the life of painters and sculptors of his day, was his insistence that he was truly an artist; not a mere artisan running a workshop.
With works that include the "David" and "Pieta" statues and the ceiling paintings of Rome's Sistine Chapel, including the "Last Judgment" we look at him today as one of the greatest sculptors and painters of all time--a true genius. While Michelangelo lived most of his life in Rome, where he died in 1564 at age 88, he always considered himself a Florentine. He also was a generous family man who created great works of art for patrons that were more often than not his friends. ( )
  jwhenderson | Mar 6, 2014 |
This ended up being just okay for me. It's certainly well-researched, careful, sober and authoritative, so that's nice. But I have two issues, both of which are sorta bigger than just this book:

1) I only read this one book about Michelangelo, which means it's hard for me to know whether Wallace's take is entirely the right one. I have no dissenting opinion, you know? In this case, my uncertainty is about Michelangelo's homosexuality. From what I've heard (including from Michelangelo himself, in the form of his wicked gay sonnets), he was pretty gay - like, somewhere between my friend Rob, who's happily married to a dude but other than that I could swear he's straight, and my friend Jeffrey, who's a slut of epic proportions. Wallace underplays and/or "excuses" this aspect of his life, though, using the hoary old "Times were different back then! Everybody wrote love letters to dudes!" and quoting mostly from his tamer poetry. I believe he's straightifying Michelangelo a bit, which I disapprove of.

(But this is a difficulty about history. We go through phases where we redefine it based on what our current society wants it to be. Lots of people would love to have Michelangelo as a gay icon. Are those people overstating their case, or is Wallace understating it? If Wallace had confronted the issue of Michelangelo's sexuality straight on, as I think he should have, I might have a better guess at the answer. Instead he tiptoes delicately around it, doing no one any favors.)

2) We build our myths based in part around what the most fun picture of a guy might be. It's fun to believe that Richard Gere stuffs hamsters in his butt, so why shouldn't I believe it? Similarly, it's fun to picture Michelangelo as this irascible, stinky old crank living in his own squalor and crazily hammering at musty old blocks of granite. But then a sober researcher like Wallace comes along and says, listen, if you just read the guy's letters, you find out he's pretty normal. Sure, a little fussy, but he bathed as much as anyone else, cracked jokes with a nice circle of friends, cared deeply about his family, and was perfectly capable of diplomacy. Okay, I believe him. But wasn't it more fun the other way?

I had the same problem when I was learning about the Dark Ages. It turns out it wasn't a wretched time of plague, burnings and constant Viking raids - at least, not completely, and not much more than the times before or after it. There was still trade, commerce, government, family...when the Roman empire collapsed, the only difference in most peoples' lives was that there were fewer Romans traipsing around demanding taxes. But that's no fun! Where's my schadenfreude?

Often it turns out that history was much cooler and/or weirder than I've been led to believe. The advanced and expansive pre-Columbian American societies are a good example of this. But sometimes it goes the other way: sometimes history turns out to be more mundane than I've imagined. I'm not complaining - well, I am, obviously, but I'm not going to stop reading. But seriously, Wallace, you're harshing my buzz. ( )
  AlCracka | Apr 2, 2013 |
While I enjoyed this breezy biography, I wish it had been more substantial when it came to describing Michelangelo's art; it's difficult to see what he contributed to the Renaissance from the mostly superficial descriptions of his work in the book. Wallace spends much more time describing contracts, logistics, and Michelangelo's testy relationship with his nephew, which is understandable because the book is based on the artist's correspondence, but it ends up minimizing his achievements. I would have appreciated a more indepth analysis of Michelangelo's feelings towards the art of his peers - particularly Raphael and Da Vinci, who only receive surprisingly brief mentions.

As for the supposedly important new angle that Michelangelo considered himself an aristocrat, it doesn't affect our view of his work or life substantially, though it does help explain some of his behavior towards his patrons. More interesting was Wallace's debunking of the popular representation of Michelangelo as an antisocial hermit. The book makes clear that he had many significant friendships and that he was gracious and often generous.

I would recommend this biography but would urge readers to supplement it with another book that considers Michelangelo's art more closely, such as Ross King's "Michelangelo and the Pope's Ceiling." ( )
  giovannigf | Sep 19, 2012 |
Wallace's biographical picture book is packed with factual information and interesting anecdotes about Michaelangelo's life and artistic career. Wallace includes numerous portraits of Michaelangelo and depictions of his artwork. This is a great book to begin a lesson on research or famous artists/historical figures.
  pbrent | Jul 15, 2012 |
Viser 5 af 5
ingen anmeldelser | tilføj en anmeldelse
Du bliver nødt til at logge ind for at redigere data i Almen Viden.
For mere hjælp se Almen Viden hjælpesiden.
Kanonisk titel
Originaltitel
Alternative titler
Oprindelig udgivelsesdato
Personer/Figurer
Vigtige steder
Vigtige begivenheder
Beslægtede film
Indskrift
Tilegnelse
Første ord
Citater
Sidste ord
Oplysning om flertydighed
Forlagets redaktører
Bagsidecitater
Originalsprog
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

Henvisninger til dette værk andre steder.

Wikipedia på engelsk

Ingen

In this vividly written biography, William E. Wallace offers a new view of the artist. Not only a supremely gifted sculptor, painter, architect and poet, Michelangelo was also an aristocrat who firmly believed in the ancient, noble origins of his family. The belief in his patrician status fueled his lifelong ambition to improve his family's financial situation and to raise the social standing of artists. Michelangelo's ambitions are evident in his writing, dress and comportment, as well as in his ability to befriend, influence and occasionally say 'no' to popes, kings and princes. Written from the words of Michelangelo and his contemporaries, this biography not only tells his own stories, but also brings to life the culture and society of Renaissance Florence and Rome. Not since Irving Stone's novel The Agony and the Ecstasy has there been such a compelling and human portrayal of this remarkable yet credible human individual.

No library descriptions found.

Beskrivelse af bogen
Haiku-resume

Current Discussions

Ingen

Populære omslag

Quick Links

Vurdering

Gennemsnit: (4.06)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 3
3.5
4 2
4.5 1
5 3

Er det dig?

Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter.

 

Om | Kontakt | LibraryThing.com | Brugerbetingelser/Håndtering af brugeroplysninger | Hjælp/FAQs | Blog | Butik | APIs | TinyCat | Efterladte biblioteker | Tidlige Anmeldere | Almen Viden | 203,240,137 bøger! | Topbjælke: Altid synlig