Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books
Indlæser... On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fictionaf Brian Boyd
Ingen Indlæser...
Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog. Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog. Readers rejoice! You may be among the fittest members of the species. The author is University Distinguished Professor in the Department of English at the University of Auckland in New Zealand. In addition to being an expert on Vladimir Nabokov, he is also a great fan of scientist and militant evolutionist Richard Dawkins. He’s combined his passions for literature and evolution into an evolutionary explanation for fiction and a new technique for literary criticism. He starts his book with the question that many of his readers are bound to ask, what does telling stories, which the teller and the audience know aren’t true, have to do with biological success? How can deliberate falsehoods be the basis for a more successful organism? Boyd carefully and logically, based on scientific evidence, builds his case, and it’s a fascinating one. Noting that individual organisms are at an advantage if they look out for their own interests, he also notes that groups of organisms also have a better chance of survival if they cooperate. So both selfishness and altruism are products of evolutionary economy. Humans are not the most successful predators when they hunt alone armed only with a spear, but a group of cooperating hunters can heard the prey into an enclosure and have a very successful hunt. Humans, an “ultrasocial” species in Boyd’s words, therefore gain an advantage by being interested in the doings of other humans. We watch them their body language to search for clues to determine what they might do next. And we, like many other animals, love to play. It gives us pleasure. “Pleasure is nature’s way of motivating creatures to perform an activity now—and in the case of play, to expend energy eagerly in mastering skills and acquiring strengths that they may need later in urgent or volatile situations, in attack, defense, and social competition and cooperation.” (page 179) Art, Boyd argues, is a form of cognitive play. Playful thinking, which is enjoyable, enables us to do better at practical thinking and problem solving. Storytelling with its pleasurable patterns and its ability to describe the motives and beliefs of multiple characters allows us to be better cooperators and competitors. In the last part of the book Boyd turns his new method on two very different works of literature, the Odyssey and Horton Hears a Who! It certainly gave me a whole new way of appreciating the artistic devices and appeal of the two tales. ingen anmeldelser | tilføj en anmeldelse
Hæderspriser
A century and a half after the publication of Origin of Species, evolutionary thinking has expanded beyond the field of biology to include virtually all human-related subjects ?anthropology, archeology, psychology, economics, religion, morality, politics, culture, and art. Now a distinguished scholar offers the first comprehensive account of the evolutionary origins of art and storytelling. Brian Boyd explains why we tell stories, how our minds are shaped to understand them, and what difference an evolutionary understanding of human nature makes to stories we love. Art is a specifically human adaptation, Boyd argues. It offers tangible advantages for human survival, and it derives from play, itself an adaptation widespread among more intelligent animals. More particularly, our fondness for storytelling has sharpened social cognition, encouraged cooperation, and fostered creativity. After considering art as adaptation, Boyd examines Homer ?s Odyssey and Dr. Seuss ?s Horton Hears a Who! demonstrating how an evolutionary lens can offer new understanding and appreciation of specific works. What triggers our emotional engagement with these works? What patterns facilitate our responses? The need to hold an audience ?s attention, Boyd underscores, is the fundamental problem facing all storytellers. Enduring artists arrive at solutions that appeal to cognitive universals: an insight out of step with contemporary criticism, which obscures both the individual and universal. Published for the bicentenary of Darwin ?s birth and the 150th anniversary of the publication of Origin of Species, Boyd ?s study embraces a Darwinian view of human nature and art, and offers a credo for a new humanism. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsIngenPopulære omslag
Google Books — Indlæser... GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)809.3Literature By Topic History, description and criticism of more than two literatures FictionLC-klassificeringVurderingGennemsnit:
Er det dig?Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter. |
All of which sounds like extremely rich territory to explore, but I have to say that I didn't really find this nearly as fascinating or full of new insights as I'd expected. Which I think may be due in large part to not being the expected audience for this book, coming as I do from a science, rather than a litcrit background. Boyd's main theses sound very nearly self-evident to me, but he spends a lot of time defending them from expected (and, I'd guess, correctly expected) criticism and hostility from those invested in current notions of postmodernist literary "Theory." Really, much of what he has to say about the way in which such folks think about fiction is so ridiculous in my view that if I hadn't myself dipped a toe or two into the subject in the past, I'd assume he was just setting up straw men, but sadly I think I do know just enough about it to know that that's probably very much not the case.
Boyd also provides a couple of examples of what he thinks it looks like to view literary works through this kind of evolutionary perspective, using two familiar but almost amusingly different works of fiction: The Odyssey and Horton Hears a Who. To be honest, I found his discussion of The Odyssey rather tedious. He seems to be belaboring much the same points about it over and over, none of them very vividly or in a way that seems incredibly valuable, so I'm not sure it's doing any favors for his idea that this is a useful way to approach things here. The chapters on Horton Hears a Who, on the other hand, were surprisingly interesting, made some better points, and even taught me a few new things about Dr. Seuss. ( )