Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books
Indlæser... Science Fiction Roots and Branches: Contemporary Critical Approachesaf Rhys Garnett, R. J. Ellis (Redaktør)
Ingen Indlæser...
Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog. Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog. ingen anmeldelser | tilføj en anmeldelse
These eleven critical essays on late Victorian and modern science fiction focus primarily on the critical analyses of specific works in the light of current critical theory and debates about the social function and relevance of science fiction. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsIngen
Google Books — Indlæser... GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)809.3Literature By Topic History, description and criticism of more than two literatures FictionLC-klassificeringVurderingGennemsnit: Ingen vurdering.Er det dig?Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter. |
Of course, it is this first section that was of most interest to me. Darko Suvin and Stanislaw Lem each have an article here, but they're both kind of off. Suvin's "Counter-Projects: William Morris and the Science Fiction of the 1880s" is mostly about noticing something neat rather than doing something with it, though he freely admits that himself, while Lem's "H. G. Wells's The War of the Worlds" is more a personal response to The War of the Worlds than a scholarly article (as indicated by the vaguest of titles, perhaps), though given that it's Lem, it's a very intelligent and insightful personal response. Perhaps the strongest article in this batch, though, is co-editor Rhys Garnett's "Dracula and The Beetle: Imperial and Sexual Guilt and Fear in Late Victorian Fantasy," a discussion of the various anxieties at play in Dracula and a book called The Beetle that I had not read, but now really want to.
The most interesting article of the entire book, however, was the venerable Patrick Parrinder's "Scientists in Science Fiction: Enlightenment and After," which argues that science fiction is rarely every fully engaged with either of what he refers to as the "conservative" and "radical" critiques. The conservative view is that sf should further both scientific knowledge and appreciation of science more than it does, whereas the radical approach is that is already advances "scientism" (and hence capitalism) and needs to dial back its unthinking adulation of this ideology (64). Parrinder's argument, however, is that both of these contradictory viewpoints are true, trading on the idea that scientific knowledge is both dangerous and alluring-- or rather, alluring because of its ostensible danger. Even though "real" scientists know that they are unlikely to discover any, the appeal of science is often power. It's a useful set of ways to look at the fascinating figure of the scientist.
Most of the other essays deal with either ecological or feminist sf, and I had not read the primary texts under discussion. (Nor did the articles really make me want to, but that doesn't mean they were bad.) The two articles about novels I had read, Jerzy Jarzębski's "The World as Code and Labyrinth: Stanislaw Lem's Memoirs Found in a Bathtub" and Robert M. Philmus's "Ursula Le Guin and Time's Disposession," seemed very obvious readings of both texts; I felt like I was being told what Memoirs Found in a Bathtub and The Dispossessed were about. But I know what they're about, since I read them, and these articles did little to complicate that experience.