Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books
Indlæser... At Close Quartersaf Gerald Seymour
Ingen Indlæser...
Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog. Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog. After British ambassador gravely and publicly insults Syrian representative in Moscow [regarding the terrorist bomb attack on El Al aircraft] everybody is very happy with themselves (in that cunning politician way we showed them that we know! ) and that action brings great respect to the British diplomat from entire diplomatic corps worldwide. [return]Few years later, during the summit on Yalta, that very same British ambassador and his aide women working for British Intelligence are mowed down by machine gun fire in front of the hotel that they were to stay in. Only person from the British delegation to survive is aide s boyfriend who sees the attacker and can identify him. Soon British service declares an all-out hunt on the attacker and recruits Israeli intelligence services to help them with the task.[return]Author shows that hunting terrorist-soldiers is complete waste of time because there will always be other terrorist-soldiers to take the place of their fallen members. Also shown is complete hypocrisy of leading politicians who are more worried about possible backfire resulting in their career being ended before the time than with their actions (that they initiate hot-headed and in affect) and people they send to do the dirty work . Also shown is merciless manipulation of one people s misery and misfortune to further goals of another friendly to the cause nation.[return][return]Entire action is a sort of a Pyrrhic victory ambassador s murderer is taken down but invaluable assets are lost (long time combat veteran and numerous spies on the ground) that had true value because they were the people that have worked behind enemy lines. As for terrorist s, their lost comrade was just substituted with another man and their work continued.[return][return]Great book and rather disturbing, proving that nothing much has changed when it comes to anti terrorism from late 80 s to present.[return][return]Recommeded. ( ) After British ambassador gravely and publicly insults Syrian representative in Moscow [regarding the terrorist bomb attack on El Al aircraft] everybody is very happy with themselves (in that cunning politician way – “we showed them that we know!”) and that action brings great respect to the British diplomat from entire diplomatic corps worldwide. Few years later, during the summit on Yalta, that very same British ambassador and his aide – women working for British Intelligence – are mowed down by machine gun fire in front of the hotel that they were to stay in. Only person from the British delegation to survive is aide’s boyfriend who sees the attacker and can identify him. Soon British service declares an all-out hunt on the attacker and recruits Israeli intelligence services to help them with the task. Author shows that hunting terrorist-soldiers is complete waste of time because there will always be other terrorist-soldiers to take the place of their fallen members. Also shown is complete hypocrisy of leading politicians who are more worried about possible backfire resulting in their career being ended before the time than with their actions (that they initiate hot-headed and in affect) and people they send to do the “dirty work”. Also shown is merciless manipulation of one people’s misery and misfortune to further goals of another – “friendly to the cause” – nation. Entire action is a sort of a Pyrrhic victory – ambassador’s murderer is taken down but invaluable assets are lost (long time combat veteran and numerous spies on the ground) that had true value because they were the people that have worked behind enemy lines. As for terrorist’s, their lost comrade was just substituted with another man and their work continued. Great book and rather disturbing, proving that nothing much has changed when it comes to anti terrorism from late 80’s to present. Recommeded. This was written in the late 80s and seemed somewhat unsophisticated and old-fashioned, compared to more contemporary novels exploring similar themes of Middle-East terrorism. The story revolves around vengance for the assignation of a British Ambassador, killed in Russia by a Lebanese terrorist and seemed to me a little far-fetched. However, on the plus side, the author clearly knows the area well and its various factions and politics. ingen anmeldelser | tilføj en anmeldelse
From the author of Harry's Game - A Sunday Times '100 best crime novels and thrillers since 1945' pick Peter Holt, a young diplomat, witnesses the horrific murder of his fiance and the British Ambassador within days of a new posting to the Soviet Union. The report of the murder lands on the desk of a British Intelligence officer who suspects Palestinian involvement, althought the Russians insist that it was not a terrorist attack. The British government are determined to extract revenge and Holt is the only man able to identify the assassin. He is sent to the Lebanon and the perilous Beqa'a Valley, which serves as a stronghold for the most extreme guerilla groups. Unauthorised access to the valley is virtually impossible, and capture by the Syrian Army would result in torture and death. His only company is Noah Crane, an Israeli expert sniper, who acts as his mentor and guide. But when Syrian Intelligence learn of their presence, their cover is blown. And now it is too late to turn back. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsIngenPopulære omslag
Google Books — Indlæser... GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)823.914Literature English & Old English literatures English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1945-1999LC-klassificeringVurderingGennemsnit:
Er det dig?Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter. |