As is probably true of many everyday life books, The View from Saturday is all about the characters. I didn't really care that much about whether or not the four sixth graders won the knowledge bowl in the end; I just enjoyed reading about life from their perspectives.

Four chapters of the book are told first-person by each of the kids, and those were by far the best parts of the book. They're all really articulate, really thoughtful sixth graders who find each other and form a bond between them that involves this ritual of drinking tea on Saturdays, which is where the title comes from.

Yeah, drinking tea together on Saturdays is not the coolest thing in the world to your typical 11 or 12 year old, but it will appeal to readers who think of themselves as out of the mainstream, kids who can form their own ideas about what is cool. It's one of those books that's about appreciating how intelligent and complicated 11 or 12 year old people can be (at least from my adult perspective).

In the end, it's the idiosyncratic realness of the voices of the kids that makes this book so memorable and enjoyable. Some readers might argue that the kids are sort of unrealistically mature, kind, and intelligent, but I think extraordinary kids exist and are the kinds of characters that make for a really affecting read.
( )

it was a cute story ( )

A captivating story of four children who form a special bond and how it affects those around them. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it and will look for other books by this author. ( )

Many aspects of this Newbery are excellent. A few are not.

I was enjoying the stories and the method of story-telling until toward the end. When Mr. Singh appears and gets quite metaphysical about things, it felt like Konigsburg was having troubles wrapping up the stories and needed some help.

Loved the way the stories were told and interlaced. ( )

When I read this a few times as a kid, I was enchanted. Nadia and Julian were my favorite characters. The book opens with with the setting of a freezing cold gathering, and as a kid, I thought, "Ooh, sort of spooky that his ring could shatter a bowl. I am curious about eighth grade. It's so far away." As an adult, I was a little disappointed to find I'd missed the part about the gathering being so cold due to automatic air conditioning. As an adult, I didn't even recognize the title of the book nor associate it with the novel since it makes no sense. The book shifts POVs regularly in order to tell the kids' stories, through the first half. Third person limited for Mrs Olinski, first person for the kids. Noah is a weirdo, and doesn't know what a fact is. He states "fact" and then says his opinion. It is not cute or endearing. It is annoying. I probably did something similar in fourth grade, not in sixth grade like Noah. Adam is the adult son of a friend of his grandmother's and wow, he was annoying. Was the wedding subplot supposed to be funny? A different plot device could easily be used to link all the kids. Was the wedding subplot to show Noah as clever and decisive? Was Adam supposed to be some weird character foil for Noah? Because it was none of the above. Was this all to show how Noah knew calligraphy? Because that is a lot of pages to dedicate to such a thing. Noah doesn't sound like a twelve-year-old. He sounds like an annoying little kid trying to fit in with adults because he's having trouble making friends. I was that kid. I should identify with him, but instead I recoiled.

Nadia's chapter was up next. At first I thought she must be Noah's cousin or something because they sounded EXACTLY alike. She's not. Her mother works for Noah's father, but that's it. Nadia isn't as weird as Noah, though. She just comes off as high and mighty. She doesn't speak using contractions, which is odd. I thought of "Say Goodbye to Hollywood" by Jenny Trout, which pokes fun at the concept. Nadia's chapter of the book was probably supposed to be about her parents' divorce but really it's a bunch of blather about sea turtles and I don't care. Ethan was next, but it's also where Julian first shows up. Ethan was xenophobic and judgmental. He was pompous like the others. One thing made him seem like a twelve-year-old: his crush on Nadia. He was a bit purple prose-y in his description but I handwaved it. Nadia is shown to shockingly self-centered when she gives Julian a puppy that she named, and expects him to keep that name. She did not ask if Julian was allergic, liked dogs, wanted one, or could maintain its upkeep, especially a -puppy-. Even more importantly, she didn't ask Mr Singh! She just burbles on about how her dog is a superior genius and ugh, what a horrid child. Knapp and Froelich were awful in entirely different ways and for different reasons. Halfway through the book, I was exasperated and highly irritated. The book switched to third person omniscient, so, fine, that was that.

This book was boring and a chore to get through. Why is this recommended as a Reluctant Readers book? Don't answer that. It was rhetorical. ( )