

Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books
Indlæser... Kvindeland (1915)af Charlotte Perkins Gilman
![]()
» 31 mere 1910s (17) Books Read in 2015 (135) Books Read in 2020 (332) 20th Century Literature (477) Books Read in 2017 (2,041) Women's reading list (30) Literary Witches (20) Out of Copyright (224) SHOULD Read Books! (167) Female Author (1,109) SFFCat 2015 (12) Latin America (41) Utopia (2) Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog. A trio of male dumdums with varying levels of sexism find a country that has been populated entirely by women for centuries. The women reproduce asexually and have bred and engineered everything to be as perfect and useful as possible. This utopia is fascinating to read. It's so interesting how the author points out that a lot of what we consider gender or how women naturally are is a result of the patriarchy and its gender roles (this was written in 1915!). However, upon rereading this, I noticed how eugenics-y the book is: the Herland women are all white, despite being in a hidden part of South America or something, and they've deliberately bred themselves to be strong and tall and good at stuff and resist disease and smart, etc. I didn't really realize it until I read a quote from CPG that said that white men and women need to come together to improve the lower races, or something. All the great 19th and 20th century white feminists were all racist as hell, unfortunately. Anyway, I do like this book, but be aware of the racism and eugenics-y ways of thinking. It's critical of capitalism, the patriarchy, and Christianity (but rightfully so, imo). Loved the misandry though. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. Herland. 1915. Start Publishing, 2015. Herland by Charlotte Perkins Gilman is a utopian novelette in the tradition of Samuel Butler’s Erewhon and Edward Bellamy’s Looking Backward. It may be disappointing to readers who expect an intense psychological thriller like Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper,” the most famous of Gilman’s works. In Herland, three men stumble on an isolated community of women who have evolved to breed parthenogenically and produce only female offspring. They are imprisoned and gradually educated by the women, who are also eager to learn about the outside world. The women practice a kind of eugenics that Gilman deftly compares to horticulture. The three men are the novel’s most completely developed characters. Our narrator, Van, is the most psychologically balanced of the three, while Terry is unable to see beyond his ideal of male dominance. In the end, Herland has more to say about ideal masculinity than it does about feminist ideals. 4 stars for historical interest.
Charlotte Perkins Gilmans Sozialutopie "Herland" ist ein reines Lehrstück. Die Figuren sind nicht plastisch gezeichnet, auch die Umgebung bleibt seltsam farblos. Es geht der Autorin offensichtlich vor allem darum, aufzuzeigen, welche Möglichkeiten in der weiblichen Hälfte der Menschheit stecken. Deshalb bleibt eine schwarz/weiß, gut/böse Einteilung nicht aus. Belongs to SeriesTilhører ForlagsserienIndeholdt iEr forkortet iIndeholder elevguide
En utopisk roman om tre unge amerikanske mænds ekspedition til en ukendt egn, hvor de opdager et land, befolket af kvinder som har skabt et idealsamfund byggende på søsterskab og socialisme. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsIngenPopulære omslag
![]() GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813.4Literature English (North America) American fiction Later 19th Century 1861-1900LC-klassificeringVurderingGennemsnit:![]()
Er det dig?Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter. |
After reading The Yellow Wallpaper in grad school, I felt drawn to this novel-length work. The reader made the narrative engaging, but the adventurous storyline merely served as a framework for a less-nuanced (though humorous, and occasionally insightful) examination of the differences of men and women.
Several times during story the I longed for a book club discussion. How well did the writer understand the thinking of men? Would she hold motherhood as the highest possible calling for women if she wrote the story today? Why does the story end so abruptly?
A worthy diversion when the mind tends to wander. (