" ... The choice of reproductions matches the judiciousness of the format selected. Text and illustrations are well integrated. The 250 reproductions have been chosen from fifty-two Canadian, American, and European private and public collections. Many are familiar to archivists and historians, but others such as drawings by Father Claude Chauchetikre of La Prairie and Louis Nicolas are refreshingly new. All are reproduced to the highest technical standards. It is a delight not only to be able to read the writing on many maps but also to see their subtle colour shading, especially for exquisite specimens such as the "Cantino" map (1502), Pierre Descellier's 1546 map of the world, or Mercator's map of the north pole (1595). Paintings are handsomely reproduced, while seals and medals have been so well photographed that their details are almost revealed to the same sharpness as the engravings that are included. Manuscripts and printed matter can generally be read with little more difficulty than in the original. As well, the English translation reads with the accuracy and sure prose that we have come to expect from an accomplished translator like John Flinn, but our multicultural heritage would be enhanced if we abandoned anglicized names such as John Cabot in favour of the original, Giovanni Caboto. Andre Vachon is clearly traditional in his choice of theme, selection of material, and the historical methods that he adopts. He expounds an older interpretation that accounted for the expansion of New France in terms of missionary zeal, the geographic imperative, economic necessity, and military security. Nothing is said that reflects the historical revisionism of the last two decades with its emphasis on self-interest and the personal pecuniary motive. The heroes are familiar: Cartier, Champlain, Talon, and Laval, but not Frontenac. The author raises no serious doubts about the desire on the part of these individuals for the expansion of New France, but he is forced to admit that by 1700 the colony had become too big and too fragile. Hardly a soul is criticized in the entire text. The general reader might be amused by knowing how cunning Amerindians duped Jacques Cartier or that Champlain never learned an Indian language and judged their conduct by the standards of French law rather than according to native customs he could never appreciate. ..."--Review by T.A. Crowley ://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12657/13822.