Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books
Indlæser... The hoax of the twentieth century (udgave 1975)af A. R. Butz
Work InformationThe Hoax of the Twentieth Century af A.R. Butz
Top Five Books of 2020 (282) Indlæser...
Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog. Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog. ingen anmeldelser | tilføj en anmeldelse
With his book Hoax of the Twentieth Century, A. R. Butz, Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, was the first (and so far the only) writer to treat the entire Holocaust complex from the Revisionist perspective, in a precise scientific manner. This book exhibits the overwhelming force of historical and logical arguments which Revisionism had accumulated by the middle of the 70s. It was the first book published in the US which won for Revisionism the academic dignity to which it is entitled. It continues to be a major revisionist reference work, frequently cited by prominent personalities. This new edition comes with several supplements adding new information gathered by the author over the last 25 years. Because of its prestige, no library can forbear offering The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, and no historian of modern times can ignore it. A 'must read' for every Revisionist and every newcomer to the issue who wants to thoroughly learn about revisionist arguments. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsIngenPopulære omslag
Google Books — Indlæser... GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)940.53History and Geography Europe Europe 1918- World War IILC-klassificeringVurderingGennemsnit:
Er det dig?Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter. |
I couldn't do it, I couldn't get through it. It is written incredibly poorly. The publisher left practically no margins in the book, and they incorrectly show how they quote long portions of others work (printing it smaller instead of further indents). I understand they are on a budget and they feel they have important information to get out, but it made it nearly unreadable.
On that the documentation is poor, like the most challenging claims seem to have no thing to back them up and the boring stuff are way over documented. ( )