This book was published in 2006, so some of the information is a little out of date. For example, gravitational waves had been theorized, but not yet measured. This did little to dampen my enthusiasm for the book, though, and I especially liked the profiles of such luminaries as Albert Einstein (the family housekeeper thought him "stupid"), Richard Feynman (the Michael Jordan of physics) and Edward Teller (his life slogan, "Trust nobody."), and discovered things that I did not know about each. Lightman writes with such a sense of awe, it is easy to be captivated and carried away with him as he describes black holes, dark matter and other mysteries of the universe. We even learn a bit about Lightman himself. ( )

I've been wondering if the (un)discipline of physics has suffered the fate that so commonly befalls victims: that is, to become the bully. In the jostle for space and acceptance today by religion and science, may one speculate that this is what has happened? I keep meeting physicists who don’t even seem to realise that they are acting in ways which are not dissimilar to the methods of the administration of Christianity and some other religions against which they fought for so long. If only all scientists were forced to do some study of ethics, philosophy, sociology, etc. They don’t seem to understand that just as suspicious, ignorant Christians might once have seen this thing called science as bewitched hokery-pokery, they now appear in that position themselves, unwilling – unable? – to understand anything past their tiny area and therefore rejecting its possible legitimacy.

There are those like Rees who, in contrast to the Dawkins ‘type’ (not a physicist, but a spokesman for the more belligerent of them), modestly see areas such as religion and philosophy as outside their purview. Then again, there must be some who are capable in a modern Renaissance way to reflect upon both in an illuminating way and Lightman is one of these. This collection begins with thoughts on the relationship of science to philosophy. Lightman, being both a novelist of note as well as physicist, is entirely comfortable with discussing the nature of words, the differentiated notion of concept for the novelist and the scientist. I don’t know that I altogether agree with his ideas here, but they are thought-provoking. His loving, caring sketches of various eminent men in the field of physics are followed by his laments about his life, his chosen fields, the changed nature of life. I was utterly happy to be up at 5am today engrossed in his lovely prose, his easy way of making me feel like I had half a clue about physics and maths – nothing I’ve been reading lately has come close to giving me an idea about these things. If only I could get across what an accomplishment that is!

Five star. Reading another by him now.
( )

Occasionally I decide to read something a bit more educational. This collection of essays, by Alan Lightman, explores how we use science to understand our world. Included are essays on not only how we use our minds, but also about several famous scientists and the complexity of handling the "wired world". The author uses his expertise, not only as a scientist, but as a writer to deliver interesting viewpoints that can be understood by most people without much difficulty. It was enjoyable, for me, to learn a bit more about the process of science and also get a bit of insight into some of the science superstars. ( )

Occasionally I decide to read something a bit more educational. This collection of essays, by Alan Lightman, explores how we use science to understand our world. Included are essays on not only how we use our minds, but also about several famous scientists and the complexity of handling the "wired world". The author uses his expertise, not only as a scientist, but as a writer to deliver interesting viewpoints that can be understood by most people without much difficulty. It was enjoyable, for me, to learn a bit more about the process of science and also get a bit of insight into some of the science superstars. ( )