HjemGrupperSnakMereZeitgeist
Søg På Websted
På dette site bruger vi cookies til at levere vores ydelser, forbedre performance, til analyseformål, og (hvis brugeren ikke er logget ind) til reklamer. Ved at bruge LibraryThing anerkender du at have læst og forstået vores vilkår og betingelser inklusive vores politik for håndtering af brugeroplysninger. Din brug af dette site og dets ydelser er underlagt disse vilkår og betingelser.

Resultater fra Google Bøger

Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books

Time on the Cross af Robert Fogel
Indlæser...

Time on the Cross (original 1974; udgave 2013)

af Robert Fogel (Forfatter)

MedlemmerAnmeldelserPopularitetGennemsnitlig vurderingOmtaler
375167,615 (3.47)12
In an Afterword added in 1989, the authors assess their findings in the light of recent scholarship and debate.
Medlem:appaloosaman
Titel:Time on the Cross
Forfattere:Robert Fogel (Forfatter)
Info:Norton (2013), Edition: Revised ed., 330 pages
Samlinger:Dit bibliotek
Vurdering:
Nøgleord:history, social history, american history, slavery

Work Information

Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery af Robert William Fogel (1974)

Ingen
Indlæser...

Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog.

Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog.

» Se også 12 omtaler

Viser 2 af 2
Time on the Cross created a sensation when it was first published, and received largely favorable notice. It claimed to break new ground with its cliometric study of slavery. A notable dissenter from the praise of the book. Although not necessarily of its authors, was Herbert Gutman's Slavery and the Numbers Game, which I think all readers of this book should also read. Both books are in print as of this writing.

Fogel and Engerman (F + E, per Herbert Gutman) claim that their intention is to reveal “the record of black achievement under adversity,” but it seems that their unstated goal is to make slavery appear in a better light. I am not referring to their major argument, that slavery was efficient and economically viable, or indeed, most (but not all) of their ten “principal corrections. I am referring to their “assumptions which, though they are plausible, cannot be verified at present” and “the interpretations which do not stand on the same level of certainty.” These almost all seem to be sympathetic to the slaveholders.

This subject could have been covered without any reference to abolitionists at all. The study is not terribly in depth or systematic, let alone cliometric. F+E discuss abolitionists as if they were all Northerners with little knowledge of the South. But some members of the movement, writing and giving lectures on slavery were in fact from the South: The Grimké sisters were from a slave owning family. Frederick Douglass, William and Ellen Craft, and Harriet Jacobs were escaped slaves. Indeed, F + E makes a number of unflattering generalizations about abolitionists that are utterly lacking in support. Only the writings of a few are analyzed and dismissed as largely worthless. F + E, in accusing antislavery advocates of allowing or colluding in racist restrictions completely ignore the Reconstruction.

I am not terribly knowledgeable about the subject, nor have I any expertise in statistics. Still, I did have questions about the presentations of some of the data; as shown by Darrell Huff in How to Lie with Statistics and Joel Best's books, presentation can make even accurate figures very misleading. Arguing that on the average, slaves had a .07 percent chance of being whipped each years sounds a lot less consequential than saying that a population of 100 slave would witness an average of 70 whippings. I think that the comparison of 1870 data to 1850 data is so illegitimate that even a paucity of other information makes it worthless. It also seems to me that there were serious gaps: I find it very odd that in a work dealing with slave attitudes and aspirations there is no systematic discussion of slaves who ran away.

In discussing the question of slave concubines and prostitutes, F + E dismiss it as rare. But it must be looked at from two angles. From the perspective of the women, it might be true that few were concubines, but it could still be very common for slave owners to have a black concubine. Surely any cliometrician can see the difference. They remark dismissively that only one to two percent of negro children were fathered by whites on slave plantations. That means that a slave holder who lived on a plantation with twenty adult woman, say for forty years (age twenty to age sixty) would generally have four to eight slave children. Not all concubines would have children, especially if the master changed sexual partners frequently. The Grimké sisters had three mixed blood nephews, Ellen Craft was so fair as to be able to pass for white, Harriet Jacobs was fleeing the sexual importunities of her mistress's father, and Frederick Douglass had a white father. F + E do not discuss the plaçage system in Louisiana which seems like a serious omission.

As a stylistic issue, I would suggest that F + E should have used fewer adjectives and adverbs. To say that such-and-such occurred in a “mere” X percent of all cases is to add an editorializing element to what could have been a simple statement of fact. It is also one of my pet peeves that people confuse the frequency of something with its importance. Most people have little call for say, rattlesnake anti-venom, but when they need it, it is critical.

So I am a trifle skeptical about their methods and purposes. They claim to be showing that the reputation of slaves as unreliable and lazy is a slur and that they are putting before us proof that they were hard working and, in response to a a mixture of positive and negative incentives, identified their fortunes with their owners'. They are also obviously eager to argue that slavery was not as bad as we think.

I strongly recommend reading Herbert G. Gutman's Slavery and the Numbers Game. His analyses are often devastating, and he includes work by other authors that is not so easily available to the layperson.

As one example, F+E show that in 1790 the slave population was concentrated around the Chesapeake Bay area, but by 1860 had spread far west and south. It has been assumed that this population movement split many slave families. F+E argue that masters attempted to avoid splitting families and that the movement of the population was mostly due to entire plantations moving. They analyze the records of the interregional slave trade and conclude that 84% of individuals over fourteen who were being sold were unmarried. They argue that slaves were rarely sold away from their parents until they were of an age to strike out on their own.

Gutman points out a number of problems with these arguments. The sales records don't state the marital status of the slaves: F+E have assumed that any woman being sold without a small child is unmarried. Obviously, even if, let us say, all children under the age of two were sold with their mother, it does not follow that all married slave women have a child under two. Moreover, F + E have ignored the local slave trade and transfers entirely. Parents often gave their grown children slaves as presents, which is known to have split some families; the death of a slave owner meant that the slaves had to be split up among the heirs, or sold so that the proceeds of their sale could be be divided. Even if whole plantations moved, slaves were more strongly exogamous that their owners, and were often married to slaves on other plantations. And having one's children leave home voluntarily to make their own way is quite different from having them sold away.

Gutman continues in this fashion: throughout his book he argues that F+E have missed and misinterpreted important sources. On the matter of the absence of slave prostitutes, for example, he points out that the professions of slaves are not given, so we have not information on this point. He questions not just their mathematics but sometimes even their arithmetic.

How has the book held up over the years? In 1989, F+E issued a new book Without Consent or Contract which presents “what we have learned during the past 16 years. “Except for the corrections of a few typographical errors and the additions of the sources of direct quotations”, T/C's original text is still in print. F+E call it a “part of intellectual history in the sense that many of the findings . . . were subsequently confirmed and have become part of the consensus on the operation of the U.S. slave system.” Gutman and Bruce Levine, who wrote the introduction to the 2003 printing of Slavery and the Numbers Game might agree that it is best regarded as a piece of intellectual history alone, and disagree strongly with the claim that its findings are now part of the consensus. ( )
2 stem PuddinTame | Feb 19, 2012 |
Though it may seem to some that it has its moral defeciencies, it really does not. Fogel and Engerman put to bed many of the myths that have arisen around American slavery. The South wasn't an economic backwater, planters did not drive their slaves to death, and the slaves weren't "shiftless negroes" either. ( )
  tuckerresearch | Sep 24, 2006 |
Viser 2 af 2
ingen anmeldelser | tilføj en anmeldelse

» Tilføj andre forfattere

Forfatter navnRolleHvilken slags forfatterVærk?Status
Robert William Fogelprimær forfatteralle udgaverberegnet
Engerman, Stanley L.hovedforfatteralle udgaverbekræftet

Hæderspriser

Du bliver nødt til at logge ind for at redigere data i Almen Viden.
For mere hjælp se Almen Viden hjælpesiden.
Kanonisk titel
Originaltitel
Alternative titler
Oprindelig udgivelsesdato
Personer/Figurer
Vigtige steder
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
Vigtige begivenheder
Beslægtede film
Indskrift
Tilegnelse
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
To Mary Elizabeth Morgan's first daughter:

She has always known that black is beautiful
Første ord
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
The years of black enslavement and the Civil War in which they terminated were our nation's time on the cross. (Prologue)
Slavery is not only one of the most ancient but also one of the most long-lived forms of economic and social organization. (chapter One)
Citater
Sidste ord
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
(Klik for at vise Advarsel: Kan indeholde afsløringer.)
(Klik for at vise Advarsel: Kan indeholde afsløringer.)
Oplysning om flertydighed
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
Do not confuse or combine the primary volume and the supplemental volume.

Originally published: Boston, Mass. : Little, Brown, c1974.

"Publisher's note:

This is the primary volume of Time on the Cross
For the convenience of the general reader and student, Time on the Cross has been divided into two volumes. This primary volume, subtitled The Economics of American Negro Slavery, contains the full and complete text of Time on the Cross, as well as pertinent charts, maps, and tables, an index, and all acknowledgments.

A supplementary volume for Time on the Cross, subtitled Evidence and Methods, is also available. The supplementary volume contains all source references for the work, together with comprehensive appendixes that discuss in detail the technical, methodological, and theoretical bases for the writing of Time on the Cross" [from the 1989 printing]

"Except for the correction of a few typographical errors and the addition of the sources of direct quotations, the text of this edition of Time on the Cross remains as it was originally published in 1974. ... First, Without Consent or Contract presents more completely that we could possibly achieve through revisions of Time on the Cross what we have learned during the past sixteen years." [from Afterword 1989}
Forlagets redaktører
Bagsidecitater
Originalsprog
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

Henvisninger til dette værk andre steder.

Wikipedia på engelsk (3)

In an Afterword added in 1989, the authors assess their findings in the light of recent scholarship and debate.

No library descriptions found.

Beskrivelse af bogen
Haiku-resume

Current Discussions

Ingen

Populære omslag

Quick Links

Vurdering

Gennemsnit: (3.47)
0.5
1 3
1.5 1
2 1
2.5
3 9
3.5
4 10
4.5 2
5 5

Er det dig?

Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter.

W.W. Norton

Een udgave af denne bog er udgivet af W.W. Norton.

» Information om udgiveren

 

Om | Kontakt | LibraryThing.com | Brugerbetingelser/Håndtering af brugeroplysninger | Hjælp/FAQs | Blog | Butik | APIs | TinyCat | Efterladte biblioteker | Tidlige Anmeldere | Almen Viden | 203,235,292 bøger! | Topbjælke: Altid synlig