HjemGrupperSnakMereZeitgeist
Søg På Websted
På dette site bruger vi cookies til at levere vores ydelser, forbedre performance, til analyseformål, og (hvis brugeren ikke er logget ind) til reklamer. Ved at bruge LibraryThing anerkender du at have læst og forstået vores vilkår og betingelser inklusive vores politik for håndtering af brugeroplysninger. Din brug af dette site og dets ydelser er underlagt disse vilkår og betingelser.
Hide this

Resultater fra Google Bøger

Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books

Defending Inerrancy: Affirming the Accuracy…
Indlæser...

Defending Inerrancy: Affirming the Accuracy of Scripture for a New… (original 2012; udgave 2012)

af Norman L. Geisler (Forfatter)

MedlemmerAnmeldelserPopularitetGennemsnitlig vurderingSamtaler
1011208,309 (3.88)Ingen
Apologist Norman L. Geisler, who was one of the original drafters of the "Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy," and William C. Roach present here a defense of the traditional understanding of inerrancy for a new generation of Christians who are being assaulted with challenges to the nature of God, truth, and language. --from publisher description… (mere)
Medlem:RZIMLibrary
Titel:Defending Inerrancy: Affirming the Accuracy of Scripture for a New Generation
Forfattere:Norman L. Geisler (Forfatter)
Info:Baker Books (2012), 380 pages
Samlinger:Dit bibliotek
Vurdering:
Nøgleord:Ingen

Detaljer om værket

Defending Inerrancy: Affirming the Accuracy of Scripture for a New Generation af Norman L. Geisler (2012)

Ingen
Indlæser...

Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog.

Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog.

This review could have been much longer, since parts of the book are worse than others, (occasionally very bad), and I didn’t want to make criticisms that don’t apply more or less to the whole thing. I also didn’t want to imitate its.... style.

I will say, though, that the book is too long, or at least, contains too many parts. (It’s also repetitive, repeating, for example, the line about “inerrant phone books” five times.) Part Two with its whole summons-to-court tone (contra Bob, contra Steve) should have been dropped entirely, or at the very least integrated into Part Three, which is topical, which should have been the bulk of the book. These chapters still do have a somewhat anti-person element to them, but at least they are more organized around topics and less about venting about people than what went before.

Sometimes you do want to hear your rival’s rebuttal of your argument, but rarely does anyone want to hear the hostile lawyer’s summary version of their argument, together with every blessed thing they’ve ever heard in their life that they don’t like.

It’s a very legalistic book. I.e., implicitly, they view God as a tyrant; actually, they seem to view everyone as a tyrant! As for myself, I cannot explain what terrible thing happens when Daniel Fuller becomes accepted by others as being an evangelical.

Now, it’s your book and you can certainly go for the kill if you really think that pleases God, but I think he conforms quite closely to the negative stereotype of a lawyer (who themselves often find language objectionable or “argumentative”), which doesn’t really represent the best that the law has to offer.

Reading this book has made me less likely to read his other books.

N.B. I’ve tried to be kind, although I decline to transcribe my prayers for the authors, since I am not an angelic doctor and they are not eloquent.

But one thing I will share, and this is not a pedantic insight: I don’t think God is pleased when we demand too much certainty in this life (which is certainly news to me, too).

Although there are indeed times when the intellect wills works of mercy.
  goosecap | May 18, 2020 |
ingen anmeldelser | tilføj en anmeldelse
Du bliver nødt til at logge ind for at redigere data i Almen Viden.
For mere hjælp se Almen Viden hjælpesiden.
Kanonisk titel
Originaltitel
Alternative titler
Oprindelig udgivelsesdato
Personer/Figurer
Vigtige steder
Vigtige begivenheder
Beslægtede film
Priser og hædersbevisninger
Indskrift
Tilegnelse
Første ord
Citater
Sidste ord
Oplysning om flertydighed
Forlagets redaktører
Bagsidecitater
Originalsprog
Canonical DDC/MDS

Henvisninger til dette værk andre steder.

Wikipedia på engelsk (1)

Apologist Norman L. Geisler, who was one of the original drafters of the "Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy," and William C. Roach present here a defense of the traditional understanding of inerrancy for a new generation of Christians who are being assaulted with challenges to the nature of God, truth, and language. --from publisher description

No library descriptions found.

Beskrivelse af bogen
Haiku-resume

Quick Links

Populære omslag

Vurdering

Gennemsnit: (3.88)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5 1
3
3.5
4 2
4.5
5 1

Er det dig?

Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter.

 

Om | Kontakt | LibraryThing.com | Brugerbetingelser/Håndtering af brugeroplysninger | Hjælp/FAQs | Blog | Butik | APIs | TinyCat | Efterladte biblioteker | Tidlige Anmeldere | Almen Viden | 157,988,745 bøger! | Topbjælke: Altid synlig