Søg På Websted
På dette site bruger vi cookies til at levere vores ydelser, forbedre performance, til analyseformål, og (hvis brugeren ikke er logget ind) til reklamer. Ved at bruge LibraryThing anerkender du at have læst og forstået vores vilkår og betingelser inklusive vores politik for håndtering af brugeroplysninger. Din brug af dette site og dets ydelser er underlagt disse vilkår og betingelser.
Hide this

Resultater fra Google Bøger

Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books

Thinking, Fast and Slow af Daniel Kahneman

Thinking, Fast and Slow (original 2011; udgave 2013)

af Daniel Kahneman (Forfatter)

MedlemmerAnmeldelserPopularitetGennemsnitlig vurderingOmtaler
8,714190697 (4.13)164
Major New York TimesThe New York Times Book Review
Titel:Thinking, Fast and Slow
Forfattere:Daniel Kahneman (Forfatter)
Info:Farrar, Straus and Giroux (2013), Edition: 1st, 499 pages
Samlinger:ABQ Central Office, Dit bibliotek

Detaljer om værket

At tænke - hurtigt og langsomt af Daniel Kahneman (2011)


Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog.

Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog.

» Se også 164 omtaler

Engelsk (175)  Hollandsk (6)  Fransk (2)  Italiensk (1)  Tysk (1)  Spansk (1)  Norsk (1)  Catalansk (1)  Alle sprog (188)
Viser 1-5 af 188 (næste | vis alle)
Best brain book I have read. I didn't get the feeling that it was all just conjecture and illustrative stories. Felt like it had real experimentation behind it. Took a long time to read because it had almost too much good information in it. ( )
  royragsdale | Sep 22, 2021 |
Overrated book. Provides cheap mind puzzles, poor introduction on how mind works, and some arguments to support it. No new information introduced, just a bunch of ideas collected from other sources. Book can be compared to junk food. ( )
1 stem zenlot | Sep 21, 2021 |
I read this book after taking a business course about decision making. The professor said it’s the best he’s read on the subject. I was in the last section when I realized (the light went on!) that it’s not about how we can make better decisions - rather it’s about how we make decisions. Now, I’m going back through it to review my highlights and review it in retrospect. There are both practical and conceptual tools in here that describe how we think and thus, how we decide. I think this will help me for years to come. ( )
  DwaynesBookList | Sep 6, 2021 |
Highlights from this book should be required reading in high school. ( )
  Jerry.Yoakum | Aug 23, 2021 |
Good introduction to Kahneman and Tversky's work. The social priming stuff has been hit with the replication crisis, so I will try to take it all in with a grain of salt. The ending discussion of the remembering self and the experiencing self was a bit more speculative, a little less reliant on studies (at this point, given the problems with replication, maybe it makes little difference at the end). I'd rather catch up with Derek Parfit and his critics, though, for how to think about the moral implications of the self and the point of view that rational evaluation should take.

Still, I think the dual-process system and prospect theory makes salient an alternative to traditional economic analyses of rationality that helps us re-evaluate how one looks at the so-called problem cases. The writing was also clear. His style may bother someone that sees themselves as data-driven, but I think the anecdotal approach to explaining what he was doing (with data sprinkled in) was Kahneman applying his findings about cognitive effort to engage people that are generally better at creating/remembering narratives than processing raw statistics. In that sense, I don't mind it. There are peer-reviewed articles for the other side of me and for those readers, after all. ( )
  tonberrysc | Aug 20, 2021 |
Viser 1-5 af 188 (næste | vis alle)
The replication crisis in psychology does not extend to every line of inquiry, and just a portion of the work described in Thinking, Fast and Slow has been cast in shadows. Kahneman and Tversky’s own research, for example, turns out to be resilient. Large-scale efforts to recreate their classic findings have so far been successful. One bias they discovered—people’s tendency to overvalue the first piece of information that they get, in what is known as the “anchoring effect”—not only passed a replication test, but turned out to be much stronger than Kahneman and Tversky thought.

Still, entire chapters of Kahneman’s book may need to be rewritten.
tilføjet af elenchus | RedigerSlate.com, Daniel Engber (Dec 1, 2016)
"It is an astonishingly rich book: lucid, profound, full of intellectual surprises and self-help value. It is consistently entertaining and frequently touching..."
tilføjet af melmore | RedigerNew York Times, Jim Holt (Nov 25, 2011)
Thinking, Fast and Slow is nonetheless rife with lessons on how to overcome bias in daily life.
tilføjet af mercure | RedigerBusinessweek, Roger Lowenstein (Oct 27, 2011)

» Tilføj andre forfattere (23 mulige)

Forfatter navnRolleHvilken slags forfatterVærk?Status
Daniel Kahnemanprimær forfatteralle udgaverberegnet
Chamorro Mielke, JoaquínOversættermedforfatternogle udgaverbekræftet
Egan, PatrickReadermedforfatternogle udgaverbekræftet
Eivind LilleskjæretOversættermedforfatternogle udgaverbekræftet
Gunnar NyquistOversættermedforfatternogle udgaverbekræftet
Du bliver nødt til at logge ind for at redigere data i Almen Viden.
For mere hjælp se Almen Viden hjælpesiden.
Kanonisk titel
Alternative titler
Oprindelig udgivelsesdato
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
Vigtige steder
Vigtige begivenheder
Beslægtede film
Priser og hædersbevisninger
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
In memory of Amos Tversky
Første ord
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
Every author, I suppose, has in mind a setting in which readers of his or her work could benefit from having read it.
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
extreme outcomes (both high and low) are more likely to be found in small than in large samples. This explanation is not causal. The small population of a county neither causes nor prevents cancer; it merely allows the incidence of cancer to be much higher (or much lower) than it is in the larger population. The deeper truth is that there is nothing to explain. The incidence of cancer is not truly lower or higher than normal in a county with a small population, it just appears to be so in a particular year because of an accident of sampling. If we repeat the analysis next year, we will observe the same general pattern of extreme results in the small samples, but the counties where cancer was common last year will not necessarily have a high incidence this year. If this is the case, the differences between dense and rural counties do not really count as facts: they are what scientists call artifacts, observations that are produced entirely by some aspect of the method of research - in this case, by differences in sample size. p 111
Even now, you must exert some mental effort to see that the following two statements mean exactly the same thing: Large samples are more precise than small samples. Small samples yield extreme results more often than large samples do. p 111
When experts and the public disagree on their priorities, [Paul Slovic] says, 'Each side must respect the insights and intelligence of the other.' p 140
You can also take precautions that will inoculate you against regret. Perhaps the most useful is to b explicit about the anticipation of regret. If you can remember when things go badly that you considered the possibility of regret carefully before deciding, you are likely to experience less of it. You should also know that regret and hindsight bias will come together, so anything you can do to preclude hindsight is likely to be helpful. My personal hindsight-avoiding policy is to be either very thorough or completely casual when making a decision with long-term consequences. Hindsight is worse when you think a little, just enough to tell yourself later, 'I almost made a better choice.'     Daniel Gilbert and his colleagues provocatively claim that people generally anticipate more regret than they will actually experience, because they underestimate the efficacy of the psychological defenses they will deploy - which they label the 'psychological immune system.' Their recommendation is that you should not put too much weight on regret; even if you have some, it will hurt less than you now think.p 352
Unless there is an obvious reason to do otherwise, most of us passively accept decision problems as they are framed and therefore rarely have an opportunity to discover the extent to which our preferences are frame-bound rather than reality-bound. p 367
Sidste ord
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
(Klik for at vise Advarsel: Kan indeholde afsløringer.)
Oplysning om flertydighed
Forlagets redaktører
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
Oplysninger fra den engelske Almen Viden Redigér teksten, så den bliver dansk.
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC
Major New York TimesThe New York Times Book Review

No library descriptions found.

Beskrivelse af bogen

Populære omslag

Quick Links


Gennemsnit: (4.13)
1 15
1.5 2
2 42
2.5 8
3 192
3.5 43
4 438
4.5 74
5 499

Er det dig?

Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter.


Om | Kontakt | LibraryThing.com | Brugerbetingelser/Håndtering af brugeroplysninger | Hjælp/FAQs | Blog | Butik | APIs | TinyCat | Efterladte biblioteker | Tidlige Anmeldere | Almen Viden | 163,209,141 bøger! | Topbjælke: Altid synlig