Klik på en miniature for at gå til Google Books
Indlæser... Who's in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain (2011)af Michael S. Gazzaniga
Ingen Indlæser...
Bliv medlem af LibraryThing for at finde ud af, om du vil kunne lide denne bog. Der er ingen diskussionstråde på Snak om denne bog. An interesting study of the interplay between mind and brain. Predominantly through studying of patents who have had their corpus callosum severed, thus separating the hemispheres of the brain, the book exposes how our brains are organized and how the mind processes reality. While not an introductory book for the subject, it's not overly complicated. Neither is it overly simplified. It does a good job of explaining, and giving scientific evidence for, how we build a coherent personal narrative. All and all, it's a good book that takes a reasoned stance for free will. Rating 3.5 This book is like an introduction and an overview of many ideas. From a study of split brain to why we come up with the off the wall justification of our ideas. Gazzaniga does a great job of bringing down many ideas to a level where most people can understand it. He also cracks many jokes that lightens the ideas he is laying out.
"It romps around the intersection of neuroscience and the human condition, from Gazzaniga's own astonishing work on split-brain patients to social neuroscience, consciousness, morality and more. Free will gets a look in, but is far from the centrepiece." Belongs to SeriesGifford Lectures (2009) Notable Lists
"The "father of cognitive neuroscience" makes a powerful and provocative argument against today's common wisdom that our lives are wholly determined by physical processes we cannot control"-- No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsIngenPopulære omslag
Google Books — Indlæser... GenrerMelvil Decimal System (DDC)612.8Technology Medicine and health Human physiology Nervous systemLC-klassificeringVurderingGennemsnit:
Er det dig?Bliv LibraryThing-forfatter. |
He did not explore in depth what seemed like an obvious followup to the "people who are told free will does not exist will cheat more" experiments; even if the premise of moral inculpability is true, trying to spread this knowledge or build a justice system based on the proposed conclusions, could have far worse effects. Which kicks the dilemma back to philosophy and asking if we're primarily utilitarians caring about outcomes or if the Truth should be the foremost goal. ( )