Lee Jackson's Victorian Mysteries

SnakHistorical Mysteries

Bliv bruger af LibraryThing, hvis du vil skrive et indlæg

Lee Jackson's Victorian Mysteries

Dette emne er markeret som "i hvile"—det seneste indlæg er mere end 90 dage gammel. Du kan vække emnet til live ved at poste et indlæg.

1bibliotheque
aug 16, 2006, 5:13 am

IMHO Jackson's an odd case - he's obviously a great researcher and a very helpful chap, as his website www.victorianlondon.org proves, and he has an eye for evocative historical detail. But I've read all three of his mysteries so far London Dust, A Metropolitan Murder and The Welfare of the Dead, and all of them I found lacking in plot and characterization. Things happened, but not because they *had to*, if you see what I mean.

I feel particularly bad about saying this because I know Jackson has talent - I remember in particular a hilarious ghost story he published in "All Hallows", the Ghost Story Society magazine. (It was called "Full House" and about a man having to deal with the ghost of a highly theatrical luvvie in his flat.) I read that story and wondered why I didn't get that "Yes! Brilliant!" buzz from his full-length mysteries.

2bibliotheque
sep 6, 2007, 3:53 am

Just as a follow-up to this, Jackson's branched out into a new series featuring a female sleuth, Sarah Tanner - book one is A Most Dangerous Woman. It's a decent read, even if I think Sarah gets on the trail of the murderer a little too easily ;)

3bibliotheque
apr 27, 2008, 5:57 pm

OK, this is it. With The Mesmerist's Apprentice Jackson has finally done it. He's gone from "competent but cold" to "warm, engaging and unguessable", and his heroine Sarah Tanner is a breathing, complex human being.

I loved this one. Anyone who likes Victorian period mysteries should give this a try, you don't need to have read the first to "get it". Read it. Don't hesitate!