Picture of author.

Kurt Wimmer (1) (1964–)

Forfatter af The Thomas Crown Affair [1999 film]

For andre forfattere med navnet Kurt Wimmer, se skeln forfatterne siden.

12+ Works 1,088 Members 13 Reviews

Værker af Kurt Wimmer

The Thomas Crown Affair [1999 film] (1999) — Writer — 316 eksemplarer
Equilibrium [2002 film] (2002) — Director — 210 eksemplarer
Total Recall [2012 film] (2012) — Screenwriter — 206 eksemplarer
Law Abiding Citizen [2009 film] (2009) — Screenwriter — 167 eksemplarer
Ultraviolet [2006 film] (2006) 166 eksemplarer
Children of the Corn [2020 Film] (2023) — Director/Writer — 7 eksemplarer
Equilibrium [and] Renaissance (Double Feature Video) — Instruktør — 5 eksemplarer
The Misfits [2021 Film] (2021) — Writer — 4 eksemplarer
One Tough Bastard [1996 film] (1996) 1 eksemplar

Associated Works

Salt [2010 film] (2010) — Screenwriter — 351 eksemplarer
Street Kings [2008 film] (2008) — Writer — 46 eksemplarer
Point Break [2015 film] (2015) — Screenplay — 42 eksemplarer

Satte nøgleord på

Almen Viden

Fødselsdato
1964
Køn
male
Nationalitet
USA
Erhverv
screenwriter
film director

Medlemmer

Anmeldelser

 
Markeret
freixas | 3 andre anmeldelser | Mar 31, 2023 |
Those who read my movie reviews know that we're suckers for this type of movie. We'll go see any Science Fiction/Adventure movies as long as the trailers are fun and we've not been warned off by atrocious reviews. Even then we might still go see it. The trailers for this looked great and I only read one review, which gave it a so-so rating.

First off, I'll say, that we (by we I mean my wife and adult daughter) liked it. It's pretty much non-stop action, sometimes over the top action. The one big action scene you've already seen in the trailers is the hover car chase. It looks much better in the movie than in the trailer. I thought the trailer shots of this looked unfinished but the movie version is top notch.

If you saw the original with Arnold you know the story. Douglas Quaid (Colin Farrell, the Schwarzenegger character in the original) is a working class schlub who endures the daily commute from Australia to Great Britain to his assembly line job in the synthetic policeman factory. I'll come back to the commute later. He feels that something is missing from his life (hey, don't we all?). He decides to try the local Total Rekall (that's how it's spelled in the movie) franchise and see what everyone is talking about. "We can remember it for you wholesale" is their slogan (and the title of the original Philip K. Dick story which provides the thin basis for both movies).

He sits in the chair and decides to try out the secret agent simulation. Then all hell breaks out. The movie has the same basic storyline as the original with the colony being in Australia instead of on Mars. Whereas the original was played with tongue planted firmly in check, this version is pretty grim. Hardly a quip to alleviate the tension. The director does a decent enough job with the plot and telling a story you already know. Is it real or just an implanted memory? The movie doesn't really care.

In movies like this there are some things you just overlook. Like bodily injury. Both the Farrell and Jessica Biel character (Melina) take an enormous amount of punishment which doesn't even slow them down. You usually have to overlook the technology, stop asking yourself, is that really possible? Some characters have phones built into their hands. When you get a call, stuff lights up under the surface of your palm. Cool. Who cares if it's possible when the story takes place aome 80 years in the future?

For me there were two problems with the movie.

Kate Beckensale plays Lori, Quaid's pretend wife. I already mentioned Jessica Biel as Melina, his rebel girlfriend. In the original, Lori was played by Sharon Stone and Melina was played by Rachael Ticotin. Stone very blond, Ticotin, very not blond. Beckensale and Biel are practically twins and at times it was hard to tell who was who. You may have noticed this in the trailer. I wasn't sure if there was one woman playing a schizophrenic character or two women playing twins. But this is a minor problem.

The real problem I had was a major plot device in the movie. I mentioned that Quaid commutes daily from Australia to Great Britain. How is this possible? Supersonic aircraft? Star Trek transporter? Telecommuting? I'd have easily accepted any of those. What the movie chooses to do is posit a tunnel through the earth (right through the core). A giant capsule is loaded up with people at one end and it's dropped in the hole. It hurtles through the earth and pops out the other side. If I heard correctly, the trip takes 17 minutes. The earth is approximately 8,000 miles in diameter. 17 minutes means it moves at about 470 miles an hour, with no propulsion. They just drop it. In fact the thing is called "The Fall". The biggest question I have is why does it come out the other side and not just stop in the center? Any physics majors out there?
… (mere)
 
Markeret
capewood | 2 andre anmeldelser | Mar 7, 2022 |
2021 movie #185. 2002. Preston (Bale) is a Cleric who hunts down sense crimes in this dystopian future where the gov't drugs everyone to deaden feelings. When Preston goes off his meds he begins a journey to the underground resulting in revolution. OK film but very violent.
 
Markeret
capewood | 3 andre anmeldelser | Nov 13, 2021 |
Part of my enjoying this movie so much does of course have to do with when I saw it -- I hadn't seen a lot of dystopian action films at that point in my life, and so this likely seemed more different than it actually was. But that's only part of it; the movie's really quite good. It has some minor believability issues and plot holes, but they all tend to be regarding the unimportant stuff -- the logic of the "gun kata", how the world arranges marriages and children if emotions are prohibited, and so forth -- while the emotional and thematic core of the movie holds steady. The mood of the film is excellent -- grim without being insufferably depressing, the pacing deliberate without feeling slow. For all their questionable logic, the fight sequences look amazing. The movie has enough callbacks in dialogue and plot that it feels like it rewards you for paying attention, and enough twists that, while perhaps none of them individually very surprising, even on my fifth watch (admittedly 15 years after the first one) I didn't feel sure I remembered exactly what would happen at any given time. It's not a Great film, but it's a solid and good one, and I'm pretty sure going to keep being happy to keep rewatching every five to ten years.… (mere)
½
 
Markeret
Lucky-Loki | 3 andre anmeldelser | May 5, 2019 |

Måske også interessante?

Associated Authors

Statistikker

Værker
12
Also by
3
Medlemmer
1,088
Popularitet
#23,609
Vurdering
½ 3.5
Anmeldelser
13
ISBN
30

Diagrammer og grafer