Mark Williamson (1) (1957–)
Forfatter af Dictionary of Space Technology,
For andre forfattere med navnet Mark Williamson, se skeln forfatterne siden.
Om forfatteren
Mark Williamson is an independent Space Technology Consultant advising the space industry and the space insurance community
Værker af Mark Williamson
Satte nøgleord på
Almen Viden
- Kanonisk navn
- Williamson, Mark
- Fødselsdato
- 1957-05-12
- Køn
- male
- Nationalitet
- UK
- Uddannelse
- University of London (Queen Mary College)
- Erhverv
- space technology consultant
physicist
engineer
technical author
editor - Organisationer
- Institution of Electrical Engineers
Space Consultants International
British Aerospace
Plessey Radar - Priser og hædersbevisninger
- Aerospace Journalist of the Year - Best Air Show Submission (2005)
Aerospace Journalist of the Year - Best Space Submission (2008, 2010) - Kort biografi
- Mark Williamson BSc, MInstP, MIET, FBIS is an independent Space Technology Consultant advising the space industry and the space insurance community. A Chartered Physicist and Chartered Engineer, he has more than 25 years’ experience in satellite communications engineering, technical management and space consultancy. As a technical author, he has written more than 350 articles on space technology and several dozen papers on subjects as diverse as space law, space education and space history.
He has also served as the editor of three international space industry magazines.
His other books include The Cambridge Dictionary of Space
Technology and a student text, The Communications Satellite. [from back cover of Spacecraft Technology, 2008 edition]
Medlemmer
Anmeldelser
Hæderspriser
Måske også interessante?
Associated Authors
Statistikker
- Værker
- 5
- Medlemmer
- 24
- Popularitet
- #522,742
- Vurdering
- 3.8
- Anmeldelser
- 1
- ISBN
- 13
Technology itself is also not always explained well enough. For example, he talked quite a bit about attitude control (in particular a distinction between spin stabilisation and 3-axis stabilisation) -- but I didn't understand enough of his (short) explanation and therefore a lot of what followed was more or less meaningless to me.… (mere)