Christopher Coker (1953–2023)

This book has the virtues of being quite short (I read it in a single sitting at the library) and very accessible (the language is grade school level and it assumes almost no background knowledge). But that's about it for praiseworthiness. This book's musings are thoroughly trite and thoughtless. It's clear the author just banged out a long rant on the unavoidability of war one evening and emailed in the manuscript to the publisher the next day. On the natural inevitability of war, he actually thinks war is an adaptively persistent feature of human society (a claim he makes with nothing but just so stories and ad hoc speculation on its selective benefits) rather than the most ultimate breakdown in human sociality. If anyone doubts that it could be possible for a seemingly intelligent person to have utterly nihilistic ideas about war based in wishy washy moral relativism, this book should set you straight. On the other hand, it's a good read for anyone who wants to know in a nutshell what the most reactionary ‘reasons’ for endorsing war could be.… (mere)

This is not a book about philosophy and war. It is a book on contemporary conflict in which the author invokes philosophy to help understand the problems that we face in fighting war today. Barbarous Philosophers sets out to discuss the nature of war through the work of sixteen philosophers from Heraclitus in the sixth century BC to the philosopher-physicist Werner Heisenberg writing in the 1950s. Each section begins with a brief epigram representative of each writer's thinking. The contention of the book is that war, as opposed to warfare, is largely an invention of philosophy - our reflection on organised collective violence that date from the time we emerged from the hunter-gatherer stage of development and created the first civilisations centred around city life. The Greek philosophers were the first to invent what Pascal called the 'rules' of war and in representing the nature of war they also influenced how it was conducted to the extent that generals allowed their minds to be shaped over time by the work of philosophy. The purpose of philosophy, writes Herbert Simon, is to understand meaningful simplicity in the midst of disorderly complexity. Behind the flux of everyday life there is an 'ordered' existence which it is the task of philosophy to uncover if it can. Behind the ever changing character of war lies its nature that needs to be grasped if it is to be waged successfully.… (mere)