James K. Beilby
Forfatter af Divine Foreknowledge: Four Views
Om forfatteren
James Beilby (PhD, Morquette University) is professor of systematic and philosophical theology at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota. He is the author of Thinking About Christian Apologetics and Epistemology as Theology, the editor of Naturalism Defeated? and the coeditor of numerous volumes, vis mere including The Nature of the Atonement, Divine Foreknowledge. The Historical Jesus, and Justification. His written work has appeared in publications such as Faith and Philosophy, Philosophia Christi, Religious Studies, and Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. vis mindre
Image credit: Used by permission of Baker Publishing Group, copyright © 2008. All rights to this material are reserved. Materials are not to be distributed to other web locations for retrieval, published(see © info.)
Værker af James K. Beilby
Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (2002) 58 eksemplarer
The Routledge Companion to Modern Christian Thought (Routledge Religion Companions) (2013) — Redaktør — 13 eksemplarer
Postmortem Opportunity: A Biblical and Theological Assessment of Salvation After Death (2021) 8 eksemplarer
Epistemology as Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga's Religious Epistemology (2006) 7 eksemplarer
Satte nøgleord på
Almen Viden
Medlemmer
Anmeldelser
Hæderspriser
Måske også interessante?
Associated Authors
Statistikker
- Værker
- 14
- Medlemmer
- 1,596
- Popularitet
- #16,155
- Vurdering
- 3.7
- Anmeldelser
- 6
- ISBN
- 30
- Sprog
- 1
- Udvalgt
- 1
This book is incredibly helpful in mapping out the history, some biological/medical matters, and theological approaches to transgender questions. The introduction to the book, which frames and summaries this inta-Christian debate is worth the price alone. The authors representing the four positions are respectful towards one another, and present their positions well. The critiques offered by the interlocutors at the end of each chapter are fair, and avoid strawman arguments. I came away with a deeper recognition for the complexity of the issues related to transgenderism, both theologically (my field) and medically (not my field). Whatever one's position, this is not a matter to be quickly decided; careful thought is required. While I will leave it to the readers to decide for themselves which position they find most convincing, I will say that Strachan's position was probably weakened by his strong complementarian position, which tended to make him appear a bit tone deaf to the larger matters. This will make some of his possibly strong points less likely to be heard in the contemporary discussion. Overall, highly recommended book.… (mere)