James David Barber (1930–2004)
Forfatter af Presidents (Eyewitness Books)
Om forfatteren
James David Barber was a Duke University political scientist and provocateur best known for exploring the psychology of Oval Office aspirants and occupants. He spent years as a consultant to "NBC Nightly News" and as a board member of the Poynter Institute, a center for the study of journalism and vis mere media ethics in St. Petersburg, Florida. vis mindre
Værker af James David Barber
The Pulse of Politics: The Rhythm of Presidential Elections in the Twentieth Century (1980) 32 eksemplarer
Citizen politics; an introduction to political behavior (Markham political science series) (1972) 8 eksemplarer
Political Leadership in American Government 2 eksemplarer
Associated Works
Satte nøgleord på
Almen Viden
- Juridisk navn
- Barber, James David
- Fødselsdato
- 1930-07-31
- Dødsdag
- 2004-09-12
- Køn
- male
- Nationalitet
- USA
- Fødested
- Charleston, West Virginia, USA
- Dødssted
- Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Uddannelse
- Yale University (PhD)
University of Chicago (BA, MA) - Erhverv
- political scientist
university professor - Organisationer
- Duke University
Medlemmer
Anmeldelser
Hæderspriser
Måske også interessante?
Statistikker
- Værker
- 13
- Also by
- 1
- Medlemmer
- 814
- Popularitet
- #31,349
- Vurdering
- 3.9
- Anmeldelser
- 6
- ISBN
- 51
Barber has a clear preference for those he feels fit in the active-positive quadrant (FDR, Truman and JFK). It's not surprising, then, that he feels the active-positives have the greatest chance of success. This flip side of this, passive-negative, are exemplified by two not often grouped together: Coolidge and Eisenhower. One wonders if forty years of historical hindsight might lead to another assessment of how Ike conducted his presidency. More tragic, though, both for the individuals as well as for the nation, are three Barber groups as active-negative: Wilson, Hoover, LBJ. The common pattern he detects in them is "a process of rigidification, a movement from political dexterity to narrow insistence on a failing course of action despite abundant evidence of the failure" (p. 18).
The heuristic value of Barber's analytic tool could be seen when he turned from analyzing the past to predicting the future, in the case of the then-sitting president, Nixon. Here, Barber's analysis led him to group Nixon with active-negatives, and to foresee the strong possibility of reacting rigidly to crisis. Barber admitted that, at the time of writing (late 1971), there was as yet no sign of it happening, but boy did events from 1972-74 bear him out.
Not the last word on presidential performance, but an eye-opener for me when it first appeared that gave me much to think about.… (mere)